Assertion (A): Work function of a metal increases with increase in intensity of incident light.
Reason (R): Maximum kinetic energy of ejected photoelectrons depends upon the intensity of incident light.
1. (1) Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. (2) Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (3) (A) is true but (R) is false
4. (4) Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Assertion (A) is false: Work function is a characteristic property of the metal and is independent of light intensity.
Reason (R) is false: Maximum kinetic energy depends on frequency, not intensity. Both statements are false.
Assertion (A): In the process of photo electric emission, all the emitted photoelectrons have same KE.
Reason (R): According to Einstein’s photo electric equation \(KE= h\nu – \phi\).
1. (1) Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. (2) Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (3) (A) is true but (R) is false
4. (4) Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Assertion (A) is false: Kinetic energy of emitted photoelectrons varies from zero to maximum. Reason (R) is false: Einstein's equation is \(KE_{max}= h\nu - \phi\). Both statements are false.
Assertion (A): Kinetic energy of photoelectrons emitted by a photosensitive surface depends upon the intensity of incident photon.
Reason (R): The ejection of electrons from metallic surface is possible with frequency of incident photon below the threshold frequency.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Kinetic energy of photoelectrons depends on the frequency of incident light, not its intensity. Photoelectric emission requires the incident photon's frequency to be above the threshold frequency \(\nu_0\). Thus, both assertion (A) and reason (R) are false.
Assertion (A): Photoelectrons have a range of kinetic energy.
Reason (R): The work function varies as a function of depth from the surface.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Photoelectrons exhibit a range of kinetic energies because electrons lose varying amounts of energy while escaping the material. The work function (\phi\) is a constant for a given surface and does not vary with depth. Thus, assertion (A) is true, but reason (R) is false.
Assertion (A): Photoelectric effect demonstrates the wave nature of light.
Reason (R): The number of photoelectrons is proportional to the frequency of light.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
The photoelectric effect experimentally supports the particle (photon) nature of light, not its wave nature. The number of photoelectrons emitted is directly proportional to the intensity of incident light, not its frequency. Therefore, both assertion (A) and reason (R) are false.
Assertion (A): On increasing the frequency of incident light, the photoelectric current increases.
Reason (R): Photoelectric current depends upon the wavelength of incident light.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Increasing the frequency of incident light increases the kinetic energy of emitted photoelectrons, not the photoelectric current. Photoelectric current depends primarily on the intensity of the incident light, provided the frequency is above the threshold. Therefore, both assertion (A) and reason (R) are false.
Assertion (A): In photoelectric effect, the number of photoelectrons emitted is always equal to number of photons incident.
Reason (R): All the photons falling on the surface will eject photoelectrons.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
The number of emitted photoelectrons is generally less than the number of incident photons due to quantum efficiency and reflection losses. Photons can only eject electrons if their energy \(\text{h}\nu\) exceeds the work function \(\phi\). Both assertion (A) and reason (R) are false.
Assertion (A): Electron from metal surface ejects only when light of particular wavelength will fall on surface.
Reason (R): Light shows wave nature.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Photoelectric emission occurs only when the incident light's wavelength (\lambda\) is below a specific threshold wavelength (\lambda_0\) (A is true). Light exhibits both wave-like (e.g., diffraction) and particle-like properties (R is true). However, the wave nature of light cannot explain the threshold effect for photoelectric emission. Thus, both A and R are true, but R is not the correct explanation for A.
Assertion (A): Penetration power of hard X-ray is more than that of soft X-ray.
Reason (R): Hard X-ray is used for engineering purpose while soft X-ray is used for medical purpose.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Hard X-rays have shorter wavelengths and higher energy, leading to greater penetration power than soft X-rays. While both the assertion and reason are factually correct regarding X-ray properties and applications, the reason describes their uses, not the physical explanation for their differing penetration power.
Assertion (A): An electron and a positron moving towards each other with equal and opposite velocities can annihilate into photons.
Reason (R): A photon has non zero energy and momentum.
1. Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
2. Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
3. (A) is true but (R) is false
4. Both (A) and (R) are false
View Answer
Electron-positron annihilation converts their mass-energy into radiant energy, typically two gamma-ray photons to conserve momentum. Photons indeed possess non-zero energy and momentum. However, the reason describes a property of the resulting photons rather than the fundamental cause or mechanism of the annihilation process itself.