Assertion (A): With increase in temperature, the speed of sound in a gas increases.
Reason (R): When temperature increases, the gas molecules move faster.
The speed of sound in a gas is \(v = \sqrt{\frac{\gamma RT}{M}}\), so it increases with temperature. Thus, Assertion (A) is true. Higher temperature means gas molecules move faster, leading to quicker sound transmission. So, Reason (R) is true and explains (A).
Assertion (A): Sound waves travel faster on a hot summer day than on a cold winter day.
Reason (R): Velocity of sound is directly proportional to the temperature of medium.
Sound speed increases with temperature. A summer day is hotter than a winter day, so sound travels faster. Assertion (A) is true. The velocity of sound in a gas is proportional to the square root of the absolute temperature (\(v \propto \sqrt{T}\)), not directly proportional. So, Reason (R) is false.
Assertion (A): Beats are not observed in case of light waves from two independent sources.
Reason (R): The phase difference between two light sources changes randomly.
Stable beats require coherent sources with a constant phase difference. Independent light sources have rapidly and randomly changing phase differences, making stable beats unobservable.
Thus, Assertion (A) is true, and Reason (R) is true and is the correct explanation of (A).
Assertion (A): It is not possible to have interference between the waves produced by two violins of different frequency.
Reason (R): For interference of two waves, the phase difference between the waves must remain constant.
Assertion (A) is true. For sustained interference, sources must be coherent, meaning same frequency and constant phase difference. Two violins produce incoherent waves. Reason (R) is true and correctly states the condition for interference.
Assertion (A): A tuning fork is in resonance with a closed pipe in fundamental mode, but the same tuning fork cannot be in resonance in fundamental mode with an open pipe of same length.
Reason (R): The same tuning fork will not be in resonance with open pipe of same length due to end correction of pipe.
Assertion (A) is true. For a closed pipe of length \(L\), fundamental frequency is \(v/(4L)\). For an open pipe of same length, it's \(v/(2L)\). These are different, so the same tuning fork cannot resonate in fundamental mode with both. Reason (R) is false; the primary reason is the fundamental frequency difference (\(f_o = 2f_c\)), not solely end correction.
Assertion (A): Energy is created during constructive interference and destroyed during destructive interference.
Reason (R): The positions of constructive interference are sources of energy while the positions of destructive interference are sinks of energy.
Energy is always conserved in interference phenomena; it is merely redistributed, not created or destroyed. Thus, both Assertion (A) and Reason (R) are false.