Equilibrium and Inertial Frames – Rankers Physics

Definition of Force Inertia and First Law: Practice Problem & Solution

Assertion (A): If a particle is found to be in equilibrium in two different frames of reference implies that both frames are inertial. Reason (R): Newton's second law can be used for motion of a particle in any reference frame.
(1) Both (A) & (R) are true and the (R) is the correct explanation of the (A)
(2) Both (A) & (R) are true but the (R) is not the correct explanation of the (A)
(3) (A) is true but (R) is false
(4) Both (A) and (R) are false

Short Solution (Best for NEET):

To solve this problem, we apply the core principles of Definition of Force Inertia and First Law. Understanding the underlying formula is key to arriving at the correct answer below:

Assertion (A) is false. Two non-inertial frames accelerating identically relative to an inertial frame could both observe a particle in equilibrium. Reason (R) is false. Newton's second law \( \vec{F} = m \vec{a} \) strictly applies in inertial frames; pseudo forces must be included in non-inertial frames. Therefore, both (A) and (R) are false.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *